Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32646 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2024 Thana- R S P.S. District- Araria ====================================================== Sanjay Yadav S/O Ganga Yadav Resident of Village- Bibiganj, Police StationNarpatganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-05-2025 Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of the BNS, 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant, along with Bimal Kumar Gupta, was having Rs. 2,60,000/- in a bag and was going to the factory on a scooty. Just 100 yards before the factory, three persons on a bike, who had masked their faces, overtook the scooty, stopped the informant, and at gunpoint, snatched the bag containing Rs. 2,60.000/-. The bikers then fled away.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32646 of 2025(2) dt.22-05-2025 2/2 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner has been framed by the police in this case because of his criminal antecedent. He also submits that from his possession, Rs. 9,500/- and Aadhar Card of the informant and Stamp was recovered. He also submits that no T.I. Parade has been conducted. Charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 06.12.2024

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of nine cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T