← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1454/2023disposed

Parmeshwar Lal v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-17Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1454 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15619 of 2021 ====================================================== Parmeshwar Lal S/o- Late Sheo Prasad Lal R/o- Village- Bartiar, Pokari, P.S.- Sandesh, District- Bhojpur at Arrah, presently residing at House of Sri Janardhan Pandey, House No. 182B, Birla Colony, P.O and P.SPhulwarisharif, Patna- 801505. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Shri Brajesh Mahrotra, Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar.

3.

Sri Shushil Kumar, Director, Land Records and Survey cum Additional Secretary, Directorate of Land Records and Survey, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Sri Jai Singh, Settlement Officer, Survey Settlement Department, Guljarbagh Press Compound, Patna- 800007.

5.

Sri Rupesh Ranjan Singh, Assistant Settlement Officer, Head Quarter, Survey Office, Guljarbagh, Patna- 800007.

6.

Sri Laxmi Narayan Singh, Treasury Officer, Nirman Bhawan Treasury Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Patna- 800001.

7.

Sri Puskar Kumar, Principal Accountant General (A and E), Bihar, Mahalekhakar Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna- 800001. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Roona, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Roy (Gp18) Mr. Viveka Nand Singh, AC to GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 17-04-2026 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State.

2. Learned Counsel for the State submits that this Hon'ble Court had pleased to direct to pass a reasoned and speaking order by virtue of order dated 13.01.2023 passed in

Patna High Court MJC No.1454 of 2023(6) dt.17-04-2026 2/2 CWJC No.15619 of 2021. Counsel for the State submits that order has been complied.

3. In the light of the compliance of the order, there is no need of continuation of contempt. This M.J.C. petition is hereby dropped with liberty that in case petitioner has any grievance from the said speaking order he has remedy to challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

4. Accordingly, the M.J.C. application stands disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U