Most. Dhanmanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42518 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2020 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

MOST. DHANMANTI DEVI W/O Late Narayan Rai Resident of Village - Nakardwa, P.S. - Rajepur, District - East Champaran. 2.

Sushil Rai S/o Late Narayan Rai Resident of Village - Nakardwa, P.S. - Rajepur, District - East Champaran.

3.

Dilip Rai S/o - Late Narayan Rai Resident of Village - Nakardwa, P.S. - Rajepur, District - East Champaran.

4.

Smt. Guddi Devi W/o Dilip Rai Resident of Village - Nakardwa, P.S. - Rajepur, District - East Champaran.

5.

Smt. Ranju Devi W/O Sushil Rai Resident of Village - Nakardwa, P.S. - Rajepur, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Pramod Rajpati, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-03-2022 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of abduction of the informant's daughter aged about 15 years.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42518 of 2021(2) dt.22-03-2022 2/2 further submits that petitioners were not apprehended at the spot. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the victim girl recorded under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. wherein she has not supported the prosecution version and her age has ascertained by the court below is 18 years.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Khudus Ansari, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sadar, Eat Champaran/concerned Court in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T