Sadhu @ Raju Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30155 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2018 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== SADHU @ RAJU KUMAR SINGH Son of Late Teja Singh @ Amawas Mahto Resident of Village - Taragola Uchwa Barahi, P.s.- Barari, Dist.- Katihar, at Present resident of Mallah Tola, Sabalpur Nadi, P.s.- Nadi, Dist.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 284/2018, instituted for offences under Section(s) 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that the police got information that 5-6 miscreants have assembled near Punpun Bandh. The police party reached the place of occurrence and apprehended this petitioner along with three other accused persons. It is alleged that one loaded country made Katta has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30155 of 2019(2) dt.08-05-2019 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 22.08.2018.

Keeping in view the period of custody spent by petitioner, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VIIth, Patna City, Patna in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 284/2018, subject to the conditions that (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T