Rajendra Prasad Yadav @ Rajendra Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30541 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2016 Thana- MAHNAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAJENDRA PRASAD YADAV @ RAJENDRA RAY, aged about 62 years (Male), Son of Late Ram Vilas Rai, Resident of Mohalla-Naya Tola Hasanpur Palwaiya, P.S.-Mahnar, District-Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Gulnar Begum (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No. 108 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner has earlier moved this Court for bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 78572 of 2018 which was rejected on 07.03.2019 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Petitioner is in custody since 15.04.2018. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that charge has been framed on 11.04.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the observation made in order dated 07.03.2019

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30541 of 2019(2) dt.08-05-2019 2/2 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 78572 of 2018, petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hazipur, in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No. 108 of 2016 with following conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and valid reason trial court shall have liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T