Krishna Sahu @ Krishna Kumar Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77270 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-232 Year-2018 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Krishna Sahu @ Krishna Kumar Sah son of Nathuni Sahu 2.

Ramdeo Sahu, Son of Late Asharfi Sahu, 3.

Narayan Sahu @ Narayan Kumar Sahu, Son of Ramdeo Sahu, 4.

Tuntun Sah @ Tuntun Sahu, Son of Late Asharfi Sahu (but in the impugned order wrongly typed as Son of Ramdeo Sahu), All are resident of Village- Ramauli, P.S.- Bahera, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashank Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-04-2019 The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bahera P.S.Case No. 232 of 2018 registered under Sections 307,323,326A, 341 and 504/34 of the Indian penal Code. Allegation as per FIR is that there was scuffle in between the petitioner no. 1 and the nephew of the informant that was pacified. Thereafter accused persons, informant and his family members also came at the shop and thereafter accused persons including the petitioners started threw acid on the informant and his family members causing injuries to them.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that as a matter of fact informant along with others came at the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77270 of 2018(3) dt.12-04-2019 2/2 jewelry shop of the petitioners in order to assault them and for that some scuffle took place and to save their skin this case has been lodged and that petitioners' side has also lodged a complaint case, which is Annexure-2 and there is nothing attributed against the petitioners.

Heard learned APP also who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that there are chemical burnt injury on the face of one of the injured and one of the injuries was found to be grievous in nature.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to them rather they should surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered on the basis of materials available on record and disposed of, without being prejudiced by this order, if possible, on the same day.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- U T