← Library
Patna High CourtC.Misc./104/2018dismissed

Rajendra Thakur v. Banaras Rai

2022-08-23Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.104 of 2018 ====================================================== Rajendra Thakur son of Sukan Thakur resident of village Bangara Nizamat Post Office Bangara P.S. Sahebganj Subdivision and Munsifi Muzaffarpur, West Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

Banaras Rai son of Sukdeo Rai resident of village Bangara Hizamat P.O. - Bangara, P.S. Sahebganj, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Upendra Kumar Chaubey, Advocate Ms. Sweta Kumari, Advocate Mr. Suraj Narain Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 15.07.2017 passed by the Fast Track Court No. 2, Muzaffarpur in Title Appeal No. 61 of 2010, by which, the learned lower appellate court has come to the conclusion that the document i.e. sale deed submitted by the appellant/petitioner by way of additional evidence, shall be considered at the time of final argument of the appeal. Taking into consideration the judgment in the case of Union of India Vrs. Ibrabhim Uddin & Anr. reported in 2013 (1) PLJR (SC) 48, I find that there is no infirmity in the impugned order.

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.104 of 2018(6) dt.23-08-2022 2/2 Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) S.Ali/- U