Guddu Kuraishi @ Md. Guddu Kuraishi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33307 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== GUDDU KURAISHI @ MD. GUDDU KURAISHI S/o Md. Moij Kuraishi @ Mohd. Mohij R/o Mohalla- Badi Dargah, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

JEENAT PARWEEN W/o Guddu Kuraishi @ Md. Guddu Kuraishi, D/o Sabir Kuraishi Presently residing at Village- Baro Dargah Mohalla, P.O.- Baro, P.S.- Fulwadiya, District- Begusarai ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mahtab Alam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Lakhisarai Mahila P.S. Case No. 41 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of D.P. Act. Petitioner is husband of opposite party no. 2 and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33307 of 2022(4) dt.27-09-2022 2/3 both parties are ready to settle the dispute. Without going into the merits of the matter, let the petitioner above named be released on provisional bail for a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order to the court concerned on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai Mahila P.S. Case No. 41 of 2021.

The court below is directed to make suitable effort for the purpose of conciliation between the parties. The petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue.

If an amicable resolution is worked out within three months, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional bail.

If, on the other hand, the issue is not resolved between the parties, the Court below, needless to say, would be well within its jurisdiction to exercise its judicial discretion and pass appropriate orders, which may include cancellation of the petitioner's provisional bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33307 of 2022(4) dt.27-09-2022 3/3 This application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) shahzad/- U T