Md. Jajaluddin @ Jajaluddin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42435 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhubani ====================================================== MD. JAJALUDDIN @ JAJALUDDIN Son of Motiur Rahman Resident of Village - Khajuri, P.S.- Madhubani Town, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rafat Praveen Wife of Md. Jalaluddin (D/o Abdussalam), Resident of Village - Khajuri, P.S.- Madhubani Town, District - Madhubani. A/P- Rafat Praveen, D/o Abdus Salam, R/o Mohalla - Bara Bazar, Masjid Chowk, Ward NO. 10, P.S.- Madhubani Town, Distt.- Madhubani. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Madhubani Mahila P.S. Case No. 96 of 2020 registered under Sections 323, 341, 498A, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42435 of 2021(2) dt.11-08-2021 2/3 petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is husband of the victim. The petitioner undertakes that he will cooperate during trial. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Madhubani Mahila P.S. Case No. 96 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42435 of 2021(2) dt.11-08-2021 3/3 weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T