Bihar Truck Owners Association Through Its President Namely Bhanu Shekhar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Anjani Kumar Sngh, Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3615 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15965 of 2017 ====================================================== Bihar Truck Owners Association Through Its President Namely Bhanu Shekhar Prasad Singh son of late Bindeshwari Prasad Singh Resident of Mohalla - Jagdeo Nagar, Bailey Road, P.S. - Rupaspur, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Anjani Kumar Sngh, Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar and Ors 2.
Keshav Kr. Pathak, Principal Secretary cum Commissioner, Department of Mines and Geology, Govt. of 3.
Brajesh Malhotra, Principal Secretary, Department of Cabinet Coordination, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.
Keshav Kr. Pathak, Commissioner, Department of Mines, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
5.
Asangba Chuba Ao, Director, Directorate of Mines, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 6.
Arun Prasad, Joint Secretary to the Government, Government of Bihar, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Brij Bihari Tiwary, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 25-11-2020 This application has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties who are knowingly deliberately and intentionally violating the order dated 27.11.2017 passed by this Court in CWJC No. 15965 of 2017 along with analogous writ applications including CWJC No. 16139 of 2017.
Patna High Court MJC No.3615 of 2017(8) dt.25-11-2020 2/2 In view of the change in the situation with regard to the position in law, inasmuch as the fact that the rules in question stands repealed and substituted by subsequent law, we are not inclined to entertain this petition.
It is also brought to our notice that similar petitions already stands disposed of by this Court. Today, most of the learned counsels have withdrawn the writ petitions which were listed along with the batch of this petition. As such, we dispose of the present petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same and subsequent cause of action, if the need so arises. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/jhaU