Gorakh Chaudhary @ Ajay Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33712 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2022 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Gorakh Chaudhary @ Ajay Chaudhary, Son of Fulena Chaudhary, Resident Of Village- Karinga Musehari, PS- Muffasil , Distt- Saran At Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 322 of 2022 dated 30.04.2022 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

As per prosecution case, total 41 litres of country made liquor was recovered from the poultry farm of one Krishna Singh. The allegation against the petitioner is that he threw the bag in which 16 litres of country made liquor was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33712 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 2/3 kept.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has surfaced on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused persons. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. Learned counsel has submitted that no case is made out against the petitioner. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33712 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 3/3 let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 322 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T