← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18439/2017dfd for non appearance

Faiyaz Ahmed And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-12-18Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18439 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Faiyaz Ahmed and Ors Son of Lazim Mahmed, Resident of Village- Pipra, Police Station Govindganj, District- East Champaran. 2.

Mohd. Sahim, Son of Azim Mian, Resident of Village- Saraiya, Police Station- Govindganj, District- East Champaran. 3.

Mojamil Hussain, Son of Islam Mian, Resident of Village- Saraiya, Police Station- Govindganj, District- East Champaran. 4.

Sohrab Hussain, Son of Khalil Hussain, Resident of Village- Saraiya, Police Station- Govindganj, District- East Champaran. 5.

Shamima Khatoon, Wife of Khalil Ansari, Resident of Village- Saraiya, Police Station- Govindganj, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 5.

The District Education Officer, Motihari, East Champaran. 6.

The District Programme Officer, Training RMSA and Literacy, East Champaran.

7.

The Block Education Officer, Areraj Block, East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S. C. Mishra - Sc16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the Respondent-State is present.

3. By previous order dated 20.11.2025, this matter was adjourned by way of last chance making it clear that if on

Patna High Court CWJC No.18439 of 2017(4) dt.18-12-2025 2/2 the next date, the petitioners are not interested in pressing the writ application then this Court may consider dismissing it for non-prosecution. Today again when the case is called out, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ application. Hence, in light of previous order dated 20.11.2025, the case is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Gaurav Sinha/- U