Mithu Sah v. Azim Mian

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

FIRST APPEAL No.42 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Mithu Sah 2.

Lachhan Sah @ Lakshman Sah 3.

Kanchan Sah All sons of Late Vishwanath Sah Resident of Village Noneyadih Sahdeva P.O. and P.S.- Raxaul, District- East Champaran. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

Azim Mian 2.

Amin Mian Both sons of Late Shekhawat Mian Sahdeva Both Resident of Village Noneyadih Tola P.O. and P.S.- Raxaul, District- East Champaran. 3.

The State of Bihar through the Collector, East Champaran, Motihari. Resident of P.O. and P.S.- Motihari, District- East Champaran. 4.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, East Champaran, Resident of P.O. and P.S.- Motihari, District East Champaran.

5.

The Circle Officer, Raxaul, Anchal Raxaul, P.O. and P.S.- Raxaul, DistrictEast Champaran. 6.

Mazid Mian Son of Late Chanu Mian 7.

Nek Mahmad Mian Son of Late Dukhharn 8.

Mahmood Mian Son of Mahanth Mian 9.

Manjoor Mian Son of Late Mahmood Mian 10.

Maksood Mian Son of Late Mahmood Mian 11.

Dukhi Mian Son of Late Meer Hussan Mian 12.

Sukhi Mian Son of Late Meer Hussan Mian 13.

Karnullah Mian Son of Noor Ali Mian 14.

Phulwas Mian Son of Noor Ali Mian 15.

Md. Jakir Mian Son of Noor Ali Mian 16.

Md. Kafir Mian Son of Noor Ali Mian All resident of Village Noneyadih Sahdeva, P.O. and P.S. Raxaul, DistrictEast Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Ratanakar Jha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court FA No.42 of 2022(2) dt.06-09-2022 2/2 06-09-2022 Perused the office note dated 1.9.2022.

In view of the Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts (Bihar Amendment) Act, 2013, amending section 21(1)(a), after the amendment the appeal from a decree or with the value of the original suit less than Rs.10 lacs would now lie before the learned District Judge.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal to move before the learned District Judge concerned.

The appeal is permitted to be withdrawn to enable the appellants to move before the learned District Judge. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T