Kaushal Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8082 of 2024 ====================================================== Kaushal Kumar Paswan Son of- Sitaram Paswan, Resident of Village-Kishanpur Ratwara, Ward No.-01@ Kishunpur Ratwara, P.S.-Ratwara, District-Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1 .
The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3 .
The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Division, Saharsa. 4.
The district Education Officer, Madhepura.
5 .
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Madhepura. 6.
The District Programme Officer (Madhyamik Literacy), Madhepura. 7.
The Block Education Officer, Puraini Block, District- Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bam Bahadur Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Standing Counsel (16) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This writ application has been filed for the following reliefs:- (i) To quash the memo no. 137 dated 27.02.2024 passed by the District Programme Officer Establishment whereby and where under petitioner has put under suspension fixing his head quarter at Block Resources Centre , Ghailadh contemplating a departmental proceeding on a wrong and non-existent ground.
3 . The grounds on which petitioner seeks quashing of the order of suspension is subject matter of department proceeding which has already been initiated on 19.04.2024 against the
Patna High Court CWJC No.8082 of 2024(2) dt.26-11-2024 2/2 petitioner whereby Praptra " K " has been served upon the petitioner. At this stage , this Court cannot look into the sufficiency of grounds.
4. In that view of the matter, this writ application is disposed of with direction to the concerned authority to conclude the departmental proceeding which has been initiated against petitioner, within a period of six months from the date of copy/production of this order.
5 . Accordingly , the writ application stands disposed of with aforesaid observations.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U