Raushan Kumar @ Roushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32385 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2025 Thana- GADHPURA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Raushan Kumar @ Roushan Kumar S/o Late Rambalak Paswan @ Rambalak Paswan R/o- Village- Bhansi, P.S.- Gadhpura (Garhpura), District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md.Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Garhpura P.S. Case No. 130 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 117(2), 126(2), 109(1), 74, 76 of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, in the early morning of 29.11.2025, the petitioner entered into the house of the informant and forcibly tried to establish physical relationship with eight month old pregnant daughter of the informant. When she opposed, she was threatened by the petitioner with knife who also assaulted her on abdomen and gave knife blow on the right hand of the daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32385 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026 2/3 petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The FIR has been registered after two days of the occurrence and it shows deliberation and afterthought. There is specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted the daughter of the informant by way of knife on her abdomen and on her right hand but no sharp cut injury was received by the daughter of the informant over her abdomen or her right hand. Rather there is no injury on abdomen and only injury is a lacerated wound on left hand ring finger caused by hard and blunt object and the said injury is stated to be simple.

Learned counsel further submits that the prosecution story is not believable that the petitioner forcibly tried to establish physical relationship with the daughter of the informant rather it appears to be a case of consensual relationship and they were caught by the informant and her family members. The petitioner is having antecedent of one case in which he is on bail and he is in custody since 02.12.2025. Charge sheet has been submitted.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the submission of charge sheet and period of custody of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32385 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026 3/3 petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Begusarai/concerned court, in connection with Garhpura P.S. Case No. 130 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Anuradha/- U T