Seema Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44739 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-833 Year-2019 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== SEEMA KUMAR Wife of Sri Santosh Kumar Resident of VillageJagdishpur, Police Station - Jagdishpur, District - Bhojpur at present residing Flat No. 201, Manorma Apartment, Mitra Mandal Colony, Police Station - Phulwarisharif, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Pawan Kumar Purusharthi Son of Sri Suraj Narayan Jha Resident of Village - Rani Nera Thakurbari, Police Station - Bachwarak, District - Begusarai, at present residing at House No. 369, Nehru Nagar, H.P. Gas Godown, Police Station - Patliputra, District - Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sudhir Kumar Bijpuria, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Pd. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP of the State.

2. The petitioner has filed the present application seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party no. 2 by the learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge-XII, Patna vide order dated 31.01.2020 passed in A.B.P. No.9541 of 2019.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has assailed the order granting bail to the opposite party no.2 on the ground of fraud being played on the concerned Court by producing forged and fabricated documents relating to receipt of amount of Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44739 of 2021(3) dt.08-01-2026 2/2 4,25,000/-which is brought on record by way of Annexure-2 to the petition.

4. So far as matter relates to fraud being played by producing forged and fabricated documents on the concerned Court, desirable course would be to approach the learned Court concerned which had granted anticipatory bail to the opposite party no.2.

5. In such view of the matter, the application stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move before Court concerned which had granted bail to the opposite party no.2.

6. The court concerned is directed to dispose of the said application for cancellation of bail, if filed, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from today. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T