Ravi Shankar Kumar @ Ravi Raj @Ravi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32227 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2015 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ravi Shankar Kumar @ Ravi Raj @Ravi, aged about 30 years( male), Son of Surendra Singh, Resident of Village - Ghoswar, P.S.- Sadar Hajipur, DistrictVaishali ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Y.C.Verma, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Lovekush Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. None.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-07-2019 Heard Sri Y.C.Verma, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Sri Lovekush Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared on behalf of the State. This is third attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the petitioner. Lastly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected on 07.02.2018. While rejecting the prayer for bail, direction was issued for ensuring early disposal of the case. At the same time, the prosecution as well as the concerned Superintendent of Police were directed to ensure production of witnesses, as and when required by the court below. On the last date i.e. 15.05.2019, a report was called for from the court below regarding status of the case, which has been received and kept at Flag-A. The report dated 25.05.2019
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32227 of 2019(3) dt.10-07-2019 2/2 sent by Sri P.R. Mishra, learned Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur makes it clear that out of eight prosecution witnesses, five have already been examined and for securing evidence of informant, I.O. and Doctor, necessary processes have already been issued to the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali. Meaning thereby that trial is proceeding properly.
Accordingly, there is no reason to review my earlier order. The bail petition stands dismissed.
However, it is further observed that the learned court below may ensure early disposal of the trial. (Rakesh Kumar, J.) nawalkrs/- U T