Rama Paswan @ Ramakant Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38620 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2024 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rama Paswan @ Ramakant Paswan Son Of Bishandeo Paswan @ Bishnudeo Paswan Resident Of Village - Tilrath, P.S. - Baurauni, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Braj Bhusan Poddar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a)(C) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 05.03.2024 and has been falsely implicated in the instant case with an allegation that 199 litres of liquor was recovered from a hut of the petitioner. It is submitted that petitioner vehemently denies that the hut belongs to him. It is also submitted that since petitioner has antecedent, as such, he came to be implicated in the instant case by the police with a view to save the real culprit.
4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38620 of 2024(2) dt.28-06-2024 2/2 petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No.02/2024.
6. It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than five cases, in that event, the present bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T