← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73098/2018bail granted

Dheeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-06Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.73098 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2018 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Dheeraj Kumar, S/O Rameshwar Prasad, R/V- Chawal Bazar Raxaul, Ward No. 21, P.S. Raxaul, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

M/S. Kundan Rathore and Prem Sheela Pandey, Advocates.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Mustaque Alam, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 272, 273 of the IPC and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 720 ML wine is said to have been recovered.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 720 ML wine is recovered from joint house of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come in the present case on the basis of alleged

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.73098 of 2018(2) dt.06-12-2018 2/2 recovery made from joint house of the petitioner where other family members also reside. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise at Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 193 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T