Vinod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35854 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2024 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vinod Yadav Son of Late Babulal Yadav Resident of Village - Koirgawa (Balua Deo Ray), P.S.- Jogapatti, District - West Champaran (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Adya Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. case No. 112 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that on the basis of secret information, police apprehended this petitioner with the stolen Bolero vehicle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the stolen

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35854 of 2024(2) dt.15-05-2024 2/3 vehicle. Learned counsel further referring to impugned order submitted that the seized Bolero vehicle belongs to one Satyendra Rai. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner is a driver and works on daily remuneration and he had no knowledge that the vehicle in question was stolen one. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 18.02.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. case No. 112 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35854 of 2024(2) dt.15-05-2024 3/3 fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T