Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32790/2026bail granted

Arvind Kumar Singh @Arvind Singh @ Arvind Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-13Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32790 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2026 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Arvind Kumar Singh @Arvind Singh @ Arvind Kushwaha S/o Late Harinarayan Singh R/o Mohalla - Takiya, PS - Sasaram Town, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad For the Informant :

Mr. Jagjit Roshan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2026 Heard Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Jagjit Roshan, learned counsel for the informant, and Mr. Harendra Prasad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 25.03.2026 in connection with Sasaram Town P.S. Case No. 155 of 2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the informant namely Atul Anand, S/o- Chandradev Singh had given a written report before the S.H.O. Sasaram (T) P.S. on dated 01.03.2026 alleging therein that 01.03.2026 the informant had come in Hotel Palace for Rohtas Progressive Programme. In

2/4 Hotel Arvind Singh and his persons were beating to one cameraman. He wants to save the seeds. They started to assault with him. That time is about 04:00 P.M. He has been assaulted through which he received injury on back and waist. His mobile has also snatched. His Mobile No. is 9742365635. He identified Arvind Singh, Anurag Singh and Shubham Singh. In this way, this case was instituted, which is under investigation. Hence this case.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner is named in the FIR but from perusal of the FIR it appears that there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act against the petitioner rather the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that it appears from the FIR itself that due to some petty dispute the present occurrence has taken place and there is no intention on the part of the petitioner to kill anyone and petitioner is in custody since 25.03.2026.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submit that informant has received grievous injury and apart from aforesaid, petitioner has antecedent of seventeen cases other than the present case but

3/4 fairly submits that out of seventeen cases petitioner is on bail in fourteen cases, in two cases the police has submitted Final Form and in the rest one case the petitioner has been acquitted by the learned trial court.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram Town P.S. Case No. 155 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

4/4 criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Gaurav Sinha/- U T