Tikka Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32524 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2026 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Tikka Prasad Singh S/O Ramdev Singh R/O Village- Raniganj, P.S.- Lalbandi Bazar, Dist.- Sarlahi Bazar (Nepal) @ Sarlahi (Nepal) 2.

Pramod Kumar Sah @ Pramod Kumar S/O Suresh Sah R/O VillageRaniganj, P.S.- Lalbandi Bazar, Dist.- Sarlahi Bazar (Nepal) @ Sarlahi (Nepal) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Union of India Through the Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi New Delhi ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

2. The petitioners has prayed for bail registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the possession of these petitioners, altogether 10.9 kg of Ganja like contraband was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners have submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32524 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026 2/2 case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and the police has not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. He further submits that the alleged recovery of contraband is though more than small quantity but is much less commercial quantity. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are languishing in judicial custody since 10.01.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (NDPS Act), Sitamarhi in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 10 of 2026. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T