Uday Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42328 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2019 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== UDAY YADAV, Son of Janardan Prasad @ Jano Yadav Resident of Village - Chappartar, P.S. - Pandarak, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priyanka Singh, Advocate For the informant :

Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pushpa Sinha, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-04-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the Pairvikar of the case has not given correct statement with respect to the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. However, on her personal endeavour, learned counsel come to know that petitioner has been made accused in several other cases and in such circumstances, she seeks permission to withdraw the application filed on behalf of petitioner.

Law is well settled with regard to false averments the pleading are sufficient to attract Chapter XI of the I.P.C. In this case Pairvikar of the petitioner has filed the present bail application containing false averments in paragraph No.3. This practice of having made a false statement incorporated in an

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42328 of 2021(4) dt.13-04-2022 2/2 affidavit filed before Court should always be deprecated. In view of the above submission, the application filed on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn. (Purnendu Singh, J) manish/- U T