Ramu Uraon @ Ramu Urawn v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36059 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1857 Year-2019 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar ====================================================== Ramu Uraon @ Ramu Urawn S/O Late Jaglal Urawn R/O VillageDumarikhal, T.V. Tower, P.S And Dist.- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Harihar Uraon S/O Late Raghu Nandan Uraon R/O Village- Pokharia, Santhalitola, P.S- Dankhora, Distt- Katihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Rabindra Kumar.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the complainant. It is next submitted that no agreement, as alleged in the complaint with respect to sale of land, was ever entered in between the petitioner and the complainant. It is also submitted that had any agreement been entered in between the parties, the same would have been made part of the complaint case, since no agreement was made

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36059 of 2024(2) dt.19-06-2024 2/2 part of the complaint case that in itself demonstrates that the entire allegation hinges in air. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the dispute is purely civil to which criminal colour has been given and in the event, if the complainant is aggrieved by the conduct of the petitioner for having breached the agreement, if any, in that event, he has remedies available in law for getting his grievances redressed by approaching a court of competent civil jurisdiction. 4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1857 of 2019 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T