Yugul Yadav @ Yougal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32638 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2025 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Yugul Yadav @ Yougal Yadav S/O Late Baijnath Singh R/O Vill- Dhandhuli , P.S- Charpokhari ,Dist- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sunny Kumar, Advocate :
Ms. Satakshi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2026 Heard Mr. Sunny Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Nityanand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 24.11.2025 in connection with Chapokhari P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 09.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons conspired and killed his daughter, namely, Meena Devi (now, deceased) due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32638 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 2/3 implicated in the present case merely on the basis that he is father-in-law of the deceased. He next submits that mother-inlaw of the deceased, who was also the co-accused in the present case has been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 25906 of 2026 vide order dated 24.04.2026 and husband of the deceased, who happens to be son of the petitioner is in judicial custody since 18.11.2025. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 24.11.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Ara), Bhojpur in connection with Chapokhari P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32638 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 3/3 on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T