← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/651/2015disposed

Smt. Bimla Devi @ Bimla Jaiswal v. Shri Amrit Lal Meena, Ias, Principal Secretary,

2019-07-16Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.651 of 2015 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10412 of 2010 ====================================================== Smt. Bimla Devi @ Bimla Jaiswal D/o Late Yamuna Prasad R/o Piparpanti Road, Buxar, P.S. Buxar, Distt- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Shri Amrit Lal Meena, IAS, Principal Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Sh. D.K. Shukla, IFS, Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, 6, Mangles Road, Patna.

3.

Sh. Upendra Kumar, Manager Estate, Bihar Housing Board, 6, Mangles Road, Patna.

4.

Shri Sanjay Kumar, Executive Engineer, Division-II, Bihar State Housing Board, 6, Mangles Road, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandeep Kumar with Mr. Pravin Kumar Sinha, Advocates For the BSHB :

Mr. Lalit Kishore, A.G. with Mrs. Binita Singh, JC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 16-07-2019 Heard Mr. Sandeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned AC to SC 9 for the State and Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Advocate General assisted by Mrs. Binita Singh, learned counsel for the Bihar State Housing Board (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board').

2. Second supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties no. 2 to 4. From the averments in the same, it appears that in compliance of the order of the Writ Court dated 28.01.2014 passed in the CWJC No. 10412 of 2010, the

Patna High Court MJC No.651 of 2015 dt.16-07-2019 2/2 Board has regularized the allotment of the petitioner which was earlier cancelled and interfered by the Writ Court.

3. Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Advocate General pointed out that the same has been made subject to the appeal which the Board has filed against the order dated 12.03.2019 passed in the present case by which the present exercise has been undertaken.

4. In view thereof, nothing remains in the present application. Accordingly, the same stands disposed off.

5. The files which were called by the earlier order, be returned to the Board.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U T