← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8828/2022disposed

Arun Kumar Purve @ Arun Purve v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-06Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar,Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8828 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Arun Kumar Purve @ Arun Purve, Son of Late Ram Prasad Purve @ Late Ram Prasad Purwe, Resident of Village- Tulapatganj Bazar, Sangram, Police Station- Jhanjharpur (Araria Sangram O.P.), District- Madhubani. 2.

Manoj Kumar Purve @ Manoj Purve, Son of Late Ram Prasad Purve @ Late Ram Prasad Purwe, Resident of Village- Tulapatganj Bazar, Sangram, Police Station- Jhanjharpur (Araria Sangram O.P.), District- Madhubani. 3.

Amit Kumar Purve, Son of Arun Purve @ Arun Kumar Purve, Resident of Village- Tulapatganj Bazar, Sangram, Police Station- Jhanjharpur (Araria Sangram O.P.), District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supply Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

3.

The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani. 5.

The Block Supply Officer, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani. 6.

The S.H.O. (ASOP), Jhanjharpur, Madhubani.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)

Patna High Court CWJC No.8828 of 2022 dt.06-07-2022 2/3 Date : 06-07-2022 The defect/s, as pointed out by the Stamp Report, is ignored.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. The petitioners have approached this Court for release of the seized vehicles against which confiscation proceeding has already been initiated.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners however submits that no notice has been given to them before initiating the process of confiscation.

5. The confiscating authority is thus directed to issue notice to the petitioners and decide the matter without loosing any time, preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 6.

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands

Patna High Court CWJC No.8828 of 2022 dt.06-07-2022 3/3 disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) (Jitendra Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 07.07.2022 Transmission Date N/A