Sima Devi v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8109 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.
Sima Devi Wife of Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, Resident of VillageGhanghar, P.S.- Krishna Ghat, District- Bhojpur, At present- Magadh Colony, near Kali Mandir, Digha- Ashiyana 90 feet Road, P.S.- Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna.
2.
Kumari Alka, Wife of Sri Santosh Kumar, Resident of Village- Kevaal Bhigha, P.S.- Sawani, District- Patna, At present- Magadh Colony, near Kali Mandir, Digha- Ashiyana 90 feet Road, P.S.- Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna. 3.
Parmila Devi, Wife of Sri Yogendra Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- 12/A, C.D.A.Colony Shiv Mandir, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna, At presentMadhuban Puri, Phase-2, Gandhi Nagar, Ashiyana, P.S.- Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna.
4.
Manju Kumari, Wife of Sri Ram Narayan Prajapati, Resident of VillageBhavanipur Tola, P.S.- Deo, District- Aurangabad, At present- New Nepali Nagar, near Kali Mandir Road, Ashiyana- Digha Road, P.S.- Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna.
5.
Baliram Singh, Son of Lorik Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Bishunpura, P.S.- Imadpur, District- Bhojpur, At present- Vasant Vihar Colony, near Magdh Colony, Pipe Factory Road, Ghurdaur Road, P.S.- Rajiv Nagar, DistrictPatna. 6.
Anil Kumar Yadav, Son of Ram Dahin Chaudhary, Resident of MohallaPiparpati, P.S.- Ghuthani, District- Siwan, At present- Vasant Vihar Colony, near Magdh Colony, Pipe Factory Road, Ghurdaur Road, P.S.- Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna.
7.
Jitendra Kumar, Son of Ramprit Ray, Resident of Mohalla- Patipul Digha Ghat, P.S.- Digha, District- Patna, At present- 90 fit Road, near Sonu timber, Karpuri Thakur Building, Ashiyana Digha Road, P.S.- Rajiv Nagar, DistrictPatna. ... Petitioners
Versus
1.
The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited through its Chief Managing Director,Vidyut Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna. 2.
The Chief Managing Director, Sough Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.
3.
The General Manager-cum Chief Engineer, Patna, Electric Supply Union, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Baily Road, Patna. 4.
The Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Danapur, Patna.
5.
The Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Ashiyana, Patna.
6.
The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Digha, Patna. 7.
The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, South
Patna High Court CWJC No.8109 of 2024(2) dt.16-05-2024 2/3 Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Ashiyana, Patna. ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Respondents :
Mr.Deepak Kumar, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 16-05-2024 Heard the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s) :
".......... for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities, particularly respondent No.6 and 7 to accept the application of the petitioners for an electrical connection and allow him to deposit the requisite amount for supply of an electrical connection to the premises of the petitioners situated Rajiv Nagar Police Station, District Patna."
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has stated that the present writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the Respondents No. 6 and 7 to accept the application made by the petitioners along with the requisite amounts and consider the same in accordance with law.
4. Having regard to the above made submission, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents No. 6 and 7 to accept the application of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.8109 of 2024(2) dt.16-05-2024 3/3 petitioner for an electrical connection along with the requisite amount and consider the same strictly in accordance with law. The Respondents No. 6 and 7 is directed to consider the said application within a period of four weeks from the date of the copy of the receipt of this order.
5. With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of to the extent indicated above. (A. Abhishek Reddy , J) Shamshad/- U