Guddu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31997 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2020 Thana- AAYAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== GUDDU RAM Son of Late Satendra Ram Resident of Village - Baligaon, P.S.- Ayar, District - Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shiv Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 04-12-2020 The office has pointed out several defects to which learned counsel of the petitioner assures that he shall remove the defects within four weeks from the date when Court starts physical function.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.

Petitioner is in jail custody since 31.7.2020 in connection with Ayar P.S. Case No. 77 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner happens to be son of the deceased and it appears that in course of quarrel with his father, petitioner gave

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31997 of 2020(2) dt.04-12-2020 2/2 single DANDA blow causing head injury to his father, who, on next day, died in course of his treatment.

Considering the above stated facts as well as this aspect of the matter that the investigation against the petitioner has already been completed, let the petitioner, above named, be released on provisional bail till the removal of the defects on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge - cum - Special Judge, Excise Act, Bhojpur at Ara/concerned court in connection with Ayar P.S. Case No. 77 of 2020.

It is made clear that if the defects, as pointed out by the office, are removed within the above stated period, the provisional bail of the petitioner shall be deemed to be confirmed.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) Spd/- U T