← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33237/2022bail granted

Manish Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-02Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33237 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-827 Year-2020 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Manish Choudhary Son of Ashok Choudhary R/O Village- Vidyapuri, Ward No.-02, P.S. And District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhim Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

The F.I.R. of the occurrence of loot is against unknown.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that in fact the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33237 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 2/3 transpired only on the basis of statement under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C. of co-accused namely Dilip Kumar Rai. He further submits that except the statement of co-accused Dilip Kumar Rai no cogent material has come during investigation against the petitioner and the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 22.11.2021.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner carries four more cases other than the present one.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 827 of 2020, with the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33237 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 3/3

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T