Arun Kumar @ Arun Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33686 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2025 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ====================================================== Arun kumar @ Arun chaudhary S/o Shibu Chaudhary Resident of VillageTarwa, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 13-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 109, 103(1) and 352 of BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged by the informant that the petitioner had assaulted his father over his head who ultimately succumbed to the injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case as there is an admitted land dispute pending between the parties. It has further been submitted that the parties are agnates and there is case and counter case for the said occurrence. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33686 of 2025(3) dt.13-08-2025 2/2

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and has submitted that the petitioner had assaulted the father of the informant over his head which is corroborated from the postmortem report which shows multiple fracture of right parietal bone of scalp and cause of death was found to be intracranial haemorrhage shock due to intracranial brain injury caused by hard and blunt substance.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Hence his prayer is rejected.

7. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to surrender before the learned Court below immediately and if the petitioner surrenders, the learned Court below is directed to pass necessary orders on the same day without being prejudiced by the present order of rejection.

(Sourendra Pandey, J) Prakash/- U