Baidhyanath Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31389 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2018 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== BAIDHYANATH SAHNI, aged about 58 years, Gender, Male, Son of Late Beerbal Sahni, Resident of Village- Dakshin Telhua, Mujbaniya Tola, P.S.- Nautan, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. A.K. Thakur, Mr.Nilesh Kumar Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420/467/468/471/489(A)(B)(C), 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13 of the U.A.P.A. Act.

Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure-1, giving liberty to renew his prayer after 1 year in jail custody.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 23.03.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31389 of 2019(2) dt.15-05-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 136 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T