Ramchandra Yadav @ Ram Chandra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42477 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2020 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== RAMCHANDRA YADAV @ RAM CHANDRA YADAV S/O RAMGATI YADAV R/O VILLAGE-SHASTRINAGAR, WARD NO. 14, PATHKHAULI, P.S-BAGAHA (PATHKHAULI), DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN AT BETTIAH.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Upadhyay Saurabh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Bagaha (Pathkhauli) P.S. Case No. 81 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section-30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 25.920 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is alleged that 25.920 liters wine is recovered from the motorcycle. The petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42477 of 2021(2) dt.25-10-2021 2/2 is not owner of the said motorcycle. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Pawan Kumar Pandey, learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bagaha (Pathkhauli) P.S. Case No. 81 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T