Md. Kamaal @ Md. Kamal Rahmaan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31936 of 2020 Arising Out of PS Case No.-110 Year-2020 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
Md. Kamaal @ Md. Kamal Rahmaan, aged about 37 years (Male), Son of Md. Latifur Rahman, Resident of ward no.03, Jhajhihat, Janakpur Road, Pupri, Police Station-Pupri, District-Sitamarhi. 2.
Md. Nausad @ Raju Shekh @ Md. Raju Shekh, aged about 32 years (Male), Son of Mohammad Moslim, Resident of ward no.09, Near Khairulwara Masjid Pupri Gaon, Janakpur Road, Pupri, Police Station-Pupri, DistrictSitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Manoj Kumar , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-03-2021 The matter has been heard via video conferencing.
2. Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.
3. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Pupri PS Case No. 110 of 2020 dated 12.05.2020, instituted under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307 and 447/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31936 of 2020 dt.02-03-2021 2/3
4. The allegation against the petitioners and others is general and omnibus of assault but against co-accused Md. Nizam, it is of firing which injured the informant in the abdomen.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that only one bullet injury has been found on the person of the informant and there is no other injury which clearly disapproves the fact that the others, including the petitioners, had assaulted him. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
6. Learned APP submitted that the informant has been grievously injured by firing. However, he did not controvert that the petitioners are not alleged to have shot at the informant.
7. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Pupri, District -Sitamarhi in Pupri PS Case No. 110 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and further, (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners, (ii) that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31936 of 2020 dt.02-03-2021 3/3 the petitioners and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioners and they shall co-operate with the police/prosecution and the Court. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or failure to co-operate shall lead to cancellation of their bail bonds.
8. The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T