← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33807/2022dismissed

Jhunjhun Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-06Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33807 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2021 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Jhunjhun Ram Son of Mofil Ram Resident of Village- Machhargawan, P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No.167 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

On 09.05.2022, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted before this Court that the petitioners have already been arrested by the police and prayed to withdraw the anticipatory bail application being Cr. Misc. No.65749 of 2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he made the prayer for withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application of both the petitioners inadvertently on 09.05.2022, but the fact is that the present petitioner was not arrested by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33807 of 2022(2) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 police.

In view of the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to entertain this anticipatory bail application. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is again rejected. However, if petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the learned court below shall consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner preferably on the same day without being prejudiced by this order considering the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T