Gena Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77030 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2018 Thana- RAMNAGAR DistrictWest Champaran ======================================================

1. Gena Devi Wife of Dhanraj Pandit.

2. Panmati Devi, Wife of Harraj Pandit,

3. Dhanraj Pandit,

4. Harraj Pandit @ Hemraj Pandit @ Hariraj Pandit, Both sons of Late Valdev Pandit.

5. Subhash Pandit,

6. Sikandar Pandit, Both sons of Dhanraj Pandit, All Resident of Village- Pakari Dewraj Police Station- Ram Nagar, DistrictWest Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Milind Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mustaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 15-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 354(B) (D), 504 and 506 IPC registered in connection with Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 263 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in connection with petty dispute between the parties who are admittedly pattidars. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77030 of 2018(2) dt.15-01-2019 2/2 learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran, in connection with Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 263/2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner nos. 1 and 2 shall be well represented and petitioner nos. 3 to 6 shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

Chandran/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T