Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36465/2024bail granted

Sudama Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-11Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36465 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2024 Thana- SHEIKHOPUR SARAI DistrictSheikhpura ====================================================== Sudama Kumar S/O Shivdani Kumar @ Shiv Dani Prashad Vill Panchhi, Ps Shekhopur Sarai, Distt Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sheikhopur Sarai P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024 dated 12.03.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the police personnel apprehended 13 accused persons including the petitioner and other persons fled away from the place of occurrence and one mobile phone was recovered from possession of the petitioner. The apprehended persons disclosed that they along with other accused persons are involved in providing loan to the people and also used to cheat them.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36465 of 2024(3) dt.11-07-2024 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Except one mobile phone, no incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 15.05.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34874 of 2024. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 13.03.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhopur Sarai P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Guddu/- U T