Nityanand Sharma @ Nityanand v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43259 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2020 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad ====================================================== NITYANAND SHARMA @ NITYANAND SON OF RAMJANAM SHARMA R/O VILLAGEBIHTA, P.S.- HULASGANJ, DISTRICTJEHANABAD ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Niraj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-04-2022 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 91 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the first information report and he has been falsely implicated in this case. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. previous enmity.

Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is named accused in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43259 of 2021(3) dt.28-04-2022 2/2 the first information report and there is specific allegation of assault against him which is supported by the injury report. Petitioner, therefore, does not deserve to be granted the privilege of bail.

Considering the nature of allegations levelled, the materials available on record and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The same is, therefore, rejected.

mcv/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T