Jahid Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32267 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2026 Thana- AGRER District- Rohtas ====================================================== Jahid Ansari S/o Md. Naeem Ansari @ Naimuddin Ansari Resident of Village- Nekara, PS- Agrer, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Shankar Prasad, Advocate Mrs. Jahan Ara, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Agrer P.S. Case No. 26 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 125(a), 125(b), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner, along with others being armed with stick and hockey sticks, arrived there, and the specific allegation is against one Naimuddin Ansari, who has assaulted one Rituraj Kashyap with danda.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32267 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 2/2 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that there is no allegation of overt act against the petitioner. Petitioner is merely a member of the mob. The main thrust of the allegation is against the co-accused, namely, Naimuddin Ansari. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 17.03.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Agrer P.S. Case No. 26 of 2026.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T