Pramod Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41630 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -40 Year- 2014 Thana -BARHAT District- JAMUI ====================================================== Pramod Kumar Singh Son of Late Ramdeo Singh Resident of Village - Labhet, P.S.- Barhat, District -Jamui .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manish Kumar 2 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State and the informant.

Having regard to the nature of allegation against the petitioner for offence under sections 498A/302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and that the police ultimately has submitted charge sheet against the petitioner for offence under sections 498A/306 of the Indian Penal Code, this Court keeping in view that the petitioner has got two issues and both of them now after the death of their mother (the deceased) have been left without any care as also that there are attending circumstances to show that it was a case of suicide would be inclined to grant bail to the petitioner That being so, let the petitioner, Pramod Kumar Singh, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Shyamal Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui in Barhat P.S.Case No. 40/2014, subject to the following

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41630 of 2014 (2) dt.21-01-2015 conditions:

(i) That both the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner. The bailors will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

(iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone.

surendra/- (Mihir Kumar Jha, J) U