← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16607/2017disposed

Chandradeep Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-07-14Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16607 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.1. Radha Mohan Singh Son of Chandradeep Singh, Resident of Village - Basatpur, P.S. Baroon and District- Aurangabad. 1.2. Mahendra Singh Son of Late Chandradeep Singh, Resident of Village - Basatpur, P.S. Baroon and District- Aurangabad. 1.3. Rajendra Singh Son of Late Chandradeep Singh Resident of Village - Basatpur, P.S. Baroon and District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

3.

The Additional Collector, Aurangabad.

4.

The Competent Authority cum the District Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad.

5.

The General Manager, East Central Zone Dept. of Railway Hajipur, Bihar. 6.

The Deputy Regional Manager, its officer located at Hajipur, Bihar Dept. of Railway Mughalsarai Div 7.

The Manager Dedicated Freight Carridor, Mughal Sarai its office located at Hajipur, Bihar Division ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. AC to GP-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 14-07-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"quashing the entire acquisition proceeding relating to the lands of the petitioners arising out of Gazatted notification dated 29.10.2014 published in the news paper under

Patna High Court CWJC No.16607 of 2017(4) dt.14-07-2025 2/2 section 20-A(4) of the Railway Act, 1989 on the ground that the objection filed under section 20(D)

(1) of the Act has not been considered and thus there is violation of mandatory requirement as enshrined under section 20(D)(2) of the Act and apart from that therein violation of section 20(F)

(4) as well as 20(G) of the Act."

3. The counter-affidavit of the State shows that Yadunandan Singh was blessed with two sons namely, Chandradeep Singh and Suryadeep Singh. Heirs of Chandradeep Singh is before this Court. Suryadeep Singh/heirs is/are neither the petitioner(s) nor the respondent(s).

4. In that background, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they shall be approaching the concerned respondent/authority in next four weeks so that the matter is taken to its logical conclusion.

5. Granting said liberty and without commenting on the merit of the case, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U