Bishwanath Prasad Suman v. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary Namely Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Government Of Bihar, Patn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3630 of 2017 In Letters Patent Appeal No.2031 of 2015 ====================================================== Bishwanath Prasad Suman, son of Late Hazari Lal Roy, resident of At + P.O. Bajidpur Karnail, P.S. Tajpur, District - Samastipur - 848505. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary namely Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Pratyay Amrit, the Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Government of Bihar, Daroga Rai Path , Patna.

3.

Sri Binoda Nand Jha, the Joint Secretary, Energy Department, Government of Bihar, Daroga Rai Path, Patna.

4.

Bihar Renewable Energy Development Agency through its Chairman namely Sri Pratyay Amrit, Sone Bhawan, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna. 5.

R. Lakshmanan, Director, Bihar Renewable Energy Development Agency, Sone Bhawan, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Kaushik, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) 20-04-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

The order passed by this Court dated 15.02.2017 in L.P.A. No. 2031 of 2015 (Bishwanath Prasad Suman Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) has been

Patna High Court MJC No.3630 of 2017(3) dt.20-04-2023 2/2 complied with.

A show-reply also has been filed, a copy of which affidavit has been made available to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

In case the petitioner is not satisfied with the statement made in the affidavit, he would have the liberty to challenge the same in an appropriate proceeding.

However, this contempt petition need not be kept pending.

For the afore-noted reason, we consign the records of this case and dispose off the contempt petition accordingly.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) (Harish Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- U