Pintoo Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.4571 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-724 Year-2018 Thana- MASAUDHI District- Patna ======================================================

1. Pintoo Ram

2. Chhotan Ram

3. Guddu Ram All sons of Rameshwar Ram

4. Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Ram, S/o Chhotan Ram,

5. Pappu Ram S/o Nathun Ram

6. Pramod Ram S/o Pappu Ram All Resident of Village- Chananpur, P.S. Masaurhi, District- Patna. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Lallu Prasad For the Respondent/s :

Smt Usha Kumari No-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 04-02-2019 This is an appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer of anticipatory bail dated 02.11.2018 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-IV-cumSpecial Judge, SC/ST, Patna in ABP No. 7854 of 2018 arising out of Masaurhi P.S.Case No. 724 of 2018 registered under Sections 147, 149, 379, 448, 504 and 506 of the Indian penal Code and Sections 3(i)(r)(s),W-(i)(ii) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Allegation against the appellants is of abusing the informant by caste name and specific allegation against

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4571 of 2018 dt.04-02-2019 2/2 appellant nos. 2 and 5 is of assaulting to the wife of the informant by lathi, appellant no. 3 is of assaulting to the daughter of the informant and appellant no. 4 is of trying to disrobe the wife of the informant and against appellant no. 6 is of snatching away golden Jitia of the wife of the informant. Submission of learned counsel for the appellants is that occurrence took place due to scuffle between the children of both parties and they have falsely been implicated in this case. Heard learned Spl. P.P also who has opposed the prayer of bail on the ground that there are specific allegation against all the appellants.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the appellants rather they should surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered and disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order, if possible, on the same day. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date