Lal Saheb @ Lal Saheb Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32610 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2025 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Lal Saheb @ Lal Saheb Kumar Son of Umesh Rai Resident of villageGanesh Sirisiya Sirsiya PS-Chakiya District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjana Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-05-2025 Heard Mr. Ranjana Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pal, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No.01 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 336(3), 332, 340(2), 318(4), 319(2), 317(3), 317(4), 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant was on patrolling duty and was checking the vehicle. It is alleged that one Innova car was intercepted and from that car, the petitioner along with others were apprehended. It is also alleged that from the possession of this petitioner, one country made pistol was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32610 of 2025(2) dt.21-05-2025 2/2 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He also submits that only on the basis of suspicion, petitioner has been made accused in this case. The seizure has not been made in view of Section 103 of the BNSS. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 02.01.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of three cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-20th, East Champaran, Motihari. in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T