Ashok Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3146 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Ashok Kumar Singh and Ors Son of Late Magnilal Singh, Resident of Village- Kolhatha, P.O.- Kolhatha, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka. 2.

Umesh Prasad Singh, Son of Late Mahavir Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Chapra, P.O.- Kolhatha, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka. 3.

Sri Jawahar Prasad Singh, Son of Late Radha Raman Singh, Resident of Village and P.O.- Kolhatha, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka. 4.

Sri Nawal Kishore Singh, So of Late Singeshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of Kathchatar, P.O.- Lilitari, P.S.- Rajaun, District- Banka. 5.

Sri Dinesh Yadav, Son of Late Govind Yadav, Resident of Kathchatar, P.O.- Lilitari, P.S.- Rajaun, District- Banka.

6.

Laxmikant Sah, Son of Late Bateshwar Sah, Resident of Village and P.O.- Hirambi, P.S.- Dhoraiya, District- Banka.

7.

Sri Bhup Narayan Mandal, Son of Late Jaldhar Mandal, Resident of Village and P.O.- Hirambi, P.S.- Dhoraiya, District- Banka. 8.

Sri Mahesh Prasad Singh, Son of Late Laxman Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Nemua, P.O.- Kolhatha, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka. 9.

Sri Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Son of Late Sonella Sharma, Resident of Village- Katiya, P.O.- Punsiya, P.S.- Rajaun, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through Secretary, Home Department, State of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Secretary, Home Department, State of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Collector, Banka.

4.

The S.H.O. Polce Station- Rajoun, District- Banka. 5.

The Superinetdent, Central Jai, Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Prasad Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-07-2022 Though the present writ petition has been filed for grant of J.P. Senani Samman Pension, however, the respondents have filed a counter

Patna High Court CWJC No.3146 of 2018(3) dt.18-07-2022 2/2 affidavit stating therein that the case of the petitioners does not fall within the framework of the scheme, hence, they are not entitled to grant of J.P.Senani Samman Pension.

The learned counsel for the petitioners, at this stage, submits that the petitioners may be granted liberty to persuade the respondent authorities again. Liberty, so sought, is granted. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U