← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17828/2017withdrawn

Mohan Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-10-31Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17828 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Mohan Yadav 2.

Surya Narayan Yadav.

3.

Ram Prakash Yadav. All sons of Sonelal Yadav, Resident of VillageJhajhara, P.S.- Kusheshwar Asthan, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar Patna. 3.

The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 4.

The Collector, Darbhanga.

5.

The D.C.L.R., Biraul, Darbhanga.

6.

The Anchal Adhikari, Kusheshwar Asthan, District- Darbhanga. 7.

Ram Anuj Yadav, Son of Raghuni Yadv, Resident of Village- Jhajhara, P.S.- Kusheshwar Asthan, District- Darbhanga.

8.

Nawal Kishore Choudhary, Son of Badri Narayan Choudhary, Resident of Village- Jhajhara, P.S.- Kusheshwar Asthan, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sajid Salim Khan - Sc-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that liberty may be given to the petitioners to file fresh application before the competent authority for redressal of grievance raised in the present writ petition.

3. In view of nature of prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners file an application

Patna High Court CWJC No.17828 of 2017(6) dt.31-10-2023 2/2 before the competent authority within a period of six weeks from today.

4. In the event, such application is filed by the petitioners within the said stipulated period, it is expected that the competent authority shall pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law after hearing the parties, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the application.

5. It goes without saying that if any question of limitation arises before the competent authority, the same shall be considered taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners were pursuing the issue before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

6. Writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U