← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15250/2015dismiss for nonprosecution

Pyare Lal Sah v. The Union Of India And ORS

2024-12-09Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15250 of 2015 ====================================================== Pyare Lal Sah Son of Late Sugriv Sah, Resident of Village - Didikhili, P.S. - Durgawati, District - Kaimur Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

2.

The Deputy Secretary, Ministryof Road Transport and Highways Govt. of India New Delhi.

3.

The National highway Authority of India through its Chairman - cum - Secretary Ministry of Shipping Road Transport and Highway, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

4.

The Project Director, National Highway Authority, D.I.G. Colony Maqbul Alam Road, Varanasi, U.P.

5.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua. 6.

The District Land Acquisition Officer - cum - Competent Authority, Kaimur Bhabhua.

7.

The Additional Collector - Cum - Arbitrator, Bhabhua. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, GA-8.

:

Ms. Kalpana, AC to GA-8.

For the NHAI :

Dr. Maurya Vijay Chandra, Advocate.

:

Ms. Preety Ranjan, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-12-2024 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner, however, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the National Highway Authority of India are present.

2. From the ordersheet, it appears that on previous occasions also i.e. on 21.10.2024, 18.11.2024 & 25.11.2024, no one was present on behalf of the petitioner and in the interest of justice this matter was re-notified today, however, today also no

Patna High Court CWJC No.15250 of 2015(5) dt.09-12-2024 2/2 one is present on behalf of the petitioner.

3. The matter is pending since 2015.

4. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to pursue this case, accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands dismissed due to non-prosecution.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U