← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/264/2016disposed

Rup Narayan Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh The Chief Secretary Govt. Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-09Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.264 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11918 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Rup Narayan Sah, son of Late Jagarnath Sah, resident of Village- Kurari, Police Station- Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

2. Gopal Singh son of Sri Chhangur Singh, resident of Village- Karnpura, Police Station- Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

3. Arun Kumar Singh, son of Sri Niwas Singh, resident of Village- Kalyanpur, Police Stataion- Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

4. Prabhat Kumar Singh, son of Sri Lallan Singh, resident of VillageKhamidaura, Police Station- Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

5. Arvind Kumar Singh, son of Sri Paras Nath Singh, residents of VillageAwahiya, Police Station- Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

6. Gopal Singh, son of Late Dal Singar Singh, residents of Village- Kulhariya, Police Station- Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

7. Sachchidanand Singh, son of Late Bansidhar Singh, residents of VillageRampur, Police Station- Sonhan, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

8. Kapildeo Sah, son of Late Lok Nath Sah, resident of Village- Khanethi, Police Station- Sonhan, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar.

2. The Union of India through namely U.K.S. Chouhan, the Secretary, Food and Consumer Public Distribution, Government of India, New Delhi.

3. Sri Chaiytanya Prasad, the Principal Secretary, Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri Arvind Kumar Singh, Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Supply Corporation Limited, Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

5. Sri Ajay Kumar Chaudhary, the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Cooperative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. Sri Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, the District Magistrate Cum Collector Kaimur (Bhabhua).

7. Sri Baleshwar Mishra, the District Manager, Bihar State Food Corporation, Kaimur (Bhabhua).

8. Sri B.P. Mandal, the District Co-operative Officer, Kiamur (Bhabhua).

9. Sri Dilip Kumar, the Additional Collector, Kaimur (Bhabhua).

10. Sri Sanjay Kumar Chaudhary, the Block Co-operative Extension/Prasar Officer Cum Incharge Paddy Purchase Centre (PPC-2) Durgawati, under District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

11. Sri Akhilesh Kumar, the Block Co-operative Extension/Prasar Officer Cum Incharge Paddy Purchase Centre (PPC-2) Bhabhua, under District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

12. Sri Prabhat Kumar Gaud, the Anchaladhikari, Durgawati, under DistrictKaimur (Bhabhua).

13. Sri Aditya Kumar Singh, the Anchaladhikari, Bhabhua, under DistrictKaimur (Bhabhua). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

Patna High Court MJC No.264 of 2016(5) dt.09-01-2019 2/2 For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 For the Corporation : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 09-01-2019 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the State and Corporation are present.

Vide judgment and order passed in CWJC No.11918 of 2015, certain directions were issued to the respondentCorporation. The Corporation went in appeal against the judgment and order of this Court giving rise to LPA No.436 of 2018 and the Division Bench vide judgment and order passed in the batch of appeals arising from LPA No.881 of 2016 including the appeal arising from the order which is subject matter of this proceeding, has proceeded to modify the judgment and order of this Court with further direction to constitute a committee. In view of the modification so directed by the Division Bench, the order of this Court stands merged with the order of the Division Bench and in case the writ petitioner feels aggrieved on any issue, his contempt remedy would lie elsewhere and not before this Court. If so advised, he can take recourse thereto.

With the observation above, the contempt application is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) skpathak/- U