Patna High CourtMJC/2237/2015disposed

Lalan Prasad And ORS v. The Union Of India And ORS

2018-06-25Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2237 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22223 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Lalan Prasad S/o Sri Rajendra Prasad, R/o Village - Mohiuddinpur, P.S. - Ghoshi, District - Jehanabad

2. Sandeep Kumar Patel S/o Sahdeo Prasad, R/o Village - Kutuli, P.S. - Hulasganj, District - Nalanda

3. Munindra Kumar Jha S/o Sri Rajendra Prasad, R/o Village - Mohiuddinpur, P.S. - Ghoshi, District - Jehanabad

4. Abhimanu Singh S/o Sri Kalika Singh, R/o Village -Pakri, P.S. - Bihia, District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi, namely Sh. Prakash Mishra, Son of name not known to the petitioners

2. Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi namely Sh. Prakash Mishra Son of name not known to the petitioners

3. Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Bihar Sector, Patna namely, Sh. Arun Kumar Son of name not known to the petitioners

4. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, Muzaffarpur namely Sh. Niraj Kumar, Son of name not known to the petitioners

5. Commandant, Office of the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, Muzaffarpur, namely Sh. Vinay Kumar Roy Son of name not known to the petitioners ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. Anshuman Singh, Advocate with Mr. Haridayal Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel for the Union of India.

It appears from Annexure-A to the show-cause filed by the Counsel appearing for the Opposite Party No. 3 that the authorities have stated that the petitioners are not entitled to any back wages.

Patna High Court MJC No.2237 of 2015(4) dt.25-06-2018 2/2 The contempt application stands disposed of. However, the petitioners will be at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Narendra/- U