Md. Ayub v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32521 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2019 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== MD. AYUB, Son of Late Md. Shahabuddin, Resident of Village- Old G.T. Road Shakh Garuque Mohalla, P.S.- Aurangabad town, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 66 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Case is of recovery of 36 litres of foreign liquor from a car and petitioner happens to be the owner of the car. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated only because he is the owner of the vehicle and he has no criminal antecedent and he is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed on him. Heard learned APP also.
In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32521 of 2019(2) dt.16-05-2019 2/2 order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Aurangabad, in connection with Barun P.S.Case No. 66 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further condition is that the petitioner has to co-operate in the investigation. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T